Cases 31 - 40 of 84
SPINKS v. COHEN et al
as 1:2017cv00875
Plaintiff:
GARRETT AVON SPINKS
Defendant:
MANDY K. COHEN, THOMAS PRICE and PAMELA HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00251
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ROGERS et al v. PEOPLES HOME EQUITY, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00027
Plaintiff:
ARCHIE K. ROGERS and KIM L. ROGERS
Defendant:
PEOPLES HOME EQUITY, INC. , ANDREA COTE , JASON COTE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, et al v. THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, et al
as 1:2016cv01274
Defendant:
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS , A. GRANT WHITNEY, JR. , RHONDA K. AMOROSO and others
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP , MOORE COUNTY BRANCH OF THE NAACP , JAMES EDWARD ARTHUR, SR. and others
Interested_party:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1971
BULLOCK v. SHARP
as 1:2016cv00437
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE ALVIN BULLOCK, III
Defendant:
LESLEE K. SHARP and JENNIFER J. KNOX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
INGRAM v. INDUSTRIES OF THE BLIND, INC.
as 1:2016cv00340
Plaintiff:
DEBRA K. INGRAM
Defendant:
INDUSTRIES OF THE BLIND, INC.
Mediator:
M. ANN ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ALLEY v. YADKIN COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
as 1:2016cv00100
Plaintiff:
HAROLD K. ALLEY, JR.
Defendant:
YADKIN COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00027
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WHERRY v. NELSON et al
as 1:2015cv00780
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN JOHN WHERRY, SR
Defendant:
TOM NELSON, VERONICA NELSON, ANTHONY OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00527
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
