Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01111
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GORMAN v. CHIEF OF POLICE FOR CITY OF BOONE, NC et al
as 1:2013cv00647
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL P. GORMAN
Defendant:
CHIEF OF POLICE FOR CITY OF BOONE, NC, CHIEF OF POLICE FOR CITY OF GREENSBORO, NC, CHIEF OF POLICE FOR CITY OF PINEHURST, NC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
SMITH v. FEALY et al
as 1:2013cv00115
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
JAMES FEALY, P. G. GRIMBERG, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00968
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MAISHA v. THE UNIVERSITY OF CHAPEL HILL, et al
as 1:2012cv00371
Plaintiff:
MACKEAN P. NYANGWESO MAISHA
Defendant:
THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, HOLDEN THORP, WADE H. HARGROVE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAKE UP YOUR OWN MIND, et al v. BARRETT, et al
as 1:2012cv00211
Plaintiff:
MAKE UP YOUR OWN MIND and BRYN CARMICHAEL
Defendant:
KATE R. BARRETT, CHARLES BLACKMON, NATHAN DUGGINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. O'GEARY et al
as 1:2012cv00033
Plaintiff:
LLOYD LEWIS
Defendant:
JAMES P. O'GEARY, SEAN CURRIN, COUNTY OF VANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
