Cases 1 - 10 of 12
BEY v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
ABJUL BEY and JAGUAR SUN OF BA-PAKAL LUMA NATION
Defendant:
JUDGE BRADLEY R. ALLEN, SR., GRAHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT, HAW RIVER POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
HOPKINS v. EADS et al
as 1:2021cv00078
Defendant:
J D EADS, MONTY G WOLFE, TERRY DALTON and others
Plaintiff:
TOMMY HOPKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARSHALL, et al v. C & S RAIL SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00986
Plaintiff:
AUBREY MARSHALL, RICKY LEE JONES, JR., DAVID WALKER and others
Defendant:
JACK WILSON, JASON WILSON, DUSTIN WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MARSHALL v. THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY
as 1:2017cv00726
Plaintiff:
BARBARA SUMMEY MARSHALL
Defendant:
THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GUNTER v. SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00262
Plaintiff:
DAVID RAY GUNTER
Defendant:
SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, INC. , JASON JUNKINS , DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MARSHALL v. MARSHALL
as 1:2013cv00028
Petitioner:
IERE-ANNE INGRID MARSHALL
Respondent:
ANTOINE DOMINIQUE MARSHALL, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11603 (b) Int'l Child Abduction Remedies Act
SMITH v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, et al
as 1:2012cv00038
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, CITY OF CONCORD, NC , CABARRUS COUNTY and others
Movant:
NC DEPT. SECRETARY OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
