Cases 101 - 110 of 10,042
CARANZA v. PYLES et al
as 1:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
JOSE M. CARANZA
Defendant:
OFFICER PYLES, OFFICER SHAFFER, WARDEN DAVID CASSIDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ISHMAN v. SLOCUMB et al
as 1:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY W. ISHMAN
Defendant:
OFFICER SLOCUMB, OFFICER JACKSON, CAPTAIN THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ISHMAN v. SLOCUMB et al
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY W. ISHMAN
Defendant:
OFFICER SLOCUMB, LIEUTENANT THOMPSON, CAPTAIN THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AUGHENBAUGH v. GREENSBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
RAYN ROBERT AUGHENBAUGH and RYAN ROBERT AUGHENBAUGH
Defendant:
GREENSBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT, SERGEANT A.J. SMITH and LINDSAY GAINEY TA'KAIYA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. SURRY COUNTY SHERRIFF'S OFFICE, et al
as 1:2024cv00192
Defendant:
JIMMIE CALVIN ANDERSON, SURRY COUNTY SHERRIFF'S OFFICE and BRIAN COCKERHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00197
Petitioner:
DEREK MCNEILL WASHINGTON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
PETERSON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00195
Petitioner:
DEJOUR AIKE PETERSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
THOMAS v. BIRKHEAD et al
as 1:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL THOMAS
Defendant:
SHERIFF CLARENCE F. BIRKHEAD, OFC. GLASSCOCK, WELLPATH, LLC d/b/a/ CORRECT CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOTHARP v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
ZANNIE JAY LOTHARP
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
LYNN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00194
Petitioner:
GARY GIOVON LYNN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
