Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 111 - 120 of 10,060
HYDE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00222
Petitioner: MASON WHITE HYDE
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
HICKMAN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00223
Petitioner: STEPHANIE JANE HICKMAN
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
RAMIREZ-BARRERA v. USA
as 1:2024cv00210
Petitioner: JESUS RAMIREZ-BARRERA
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
WILLIAMSON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00212
Petitioner: RODNEY ANTON WILLIAMSON
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MCGILL v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY
as 1:2024cv00206
Petitioner: MELISSA GRIFFIN MCGILL
Respondent: MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWNING v. MECKLENBURG COUNTY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00209
Plaintiff: PIERRE BROWNING
Defendant: MECKLENBURG COUNTY and DAVID LANGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RENZI v. NAPHCARE, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00211
Plaintiff: JENNIFER RENZI
Defendant: NAPHCARE, INC., BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, JR., BRIAN L. GILROY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
CARANZA v. PYLES et al
as 1:2024cv00208
Plaintiff: JOSE M. CARANZA
Defendant: OFFICER PYLES, OFFICER SHAFFER, WARDEN DAVID CASSIDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ISHMAN v. SLOCUMB et al
as 1:2024cv00207
Plaintiff: BRADLEY W. ISHMAN
Defendant: OFFICER SLOCUMB, OFFICER JACKSON, CAPTAIN THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ISHMAN v. SLOCUMB et al
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff: BRADLEY W. ISHMAN
Defendant: OFFICER SLOCUMB, LIEUTENANT THOMPSON, CAPTAIN THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?