Cases 141 - 150 of 241
BURTON v. PERSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00976
Defendant:
JOHN WALKER, JIMMY WILBORN, BEN MASSEY and others
Plaintiff:
JASMINE L. BURTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUMMERS v. SCHATZMAN
as 1:2018cv00931
Respondent:
HEAD SHERIFF WILLIAM T. SCHATZMAN
Petitioner:
JASHAWN A. SUMMERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TUCKER v. KIVETT et al
as 1:2018cv00897
Defendant:
SHERIFF SCHATZMAN, CPL. KIVETT, CAPT. GUARD SETTLE and others
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUMMERS v. USA
as 1:2018cv00802
Respondent:
USA and HEAD SHERIFF WILLIAM T. SCHATZMAN
Petitioner:
JASHAWN ARNEZ SUMMERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SHIELDS v. COUNTY OF MOORE, NC et al
as 1:2018cv00729
Defendant:
JANE DOE, COUNTY OF MOORE, NC, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS SHIELDS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARSHALL v. GREENSBORO POLICE SGT. RYAN 4TH PRECINCT et al
as 1:2018cv00709
Defendant:
GREENSBORO POLICE OFC. UNDERHILL, SHERIFF B. J. BARNES, GREENSBORO POLICE SGT. RYAN 4TH PRECINCT and others
Plaintiff:
CHAUNCEY LEE MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENGE v. RANDOLPH COUNTY et al
as 1:2018cv00648
Defendant:
B. A. MCPHERSON, P. LOVE, CAPTAIN HILL and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH BENGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHIELDS v. GODFREY et al
as 1:2018cv00602
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. SHIELDS, JR.
Defendant:
NURSE JEANIE, LT. VICTOR MOORE, SHERIFF GODFREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORMAND v. REYNOLDS et al
as 1:2018cv00094
Plaintiff:
OTTO GARY NORMAND
Defendant:
CHLOE ANNE REYNOLDS, KRISTEN W. PEEBLES, T. ALLEN "BUZZY&quo GARDNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORMAND v. REYNOLDS et al
as 1:2018cv00037
Plaintiff:
OTTO GARY NORMAND
Defendant:
CHLOE ANNE REYNOLDS, KRISTEN W. PEEBLES, T. ALLEN "BUZZY&quo GARDNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
