Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 21 - 30 of 343
CARTER v. DOE
as 1:2023cv00768
Plaintiff: KEITH CARTER
Defendant: W-S POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONTGOMERY v. BLUE et al
as 1:2023cv00742
Plaintiff: RODNEY LEE MONTGOMERY
Defendant: TEON BLUE and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HONEA v. MURCHISON et al
as 1:2023cv00694
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY ALLEN HONEA
Defendant: STAFF SERGEANT JOHN DOE MURCHISON, LIEUTENANT JOHN FALLIN, NURSE WANDA JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALL v. USA
as 1:2023cv00668
Petitioner: JOHN CARROLL WALL, JR.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
PATTERSON v. WOLFE et al
as 1:2023cv00614
Plaintiff: SAMUEL LEE PATTERSON
Defendant: M.G. WOLFE, B. LAWS and OFFICER(S) JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
QUEEN v. CITY OF GREENSBORO et al
as 1:2023cv00565
Plaintiff: DARNELL QUEEN
Defendant: CITY OF GREENSBORO, JOHN DOE I, II, III & IV, FORMER A.D.A. MAURY HUBBARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIDES v. KIMBROUGH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00502
Plaintiff: ANTHONY SIDES
Defendant: BOBBY KIMBROUGH, JOHN DOE CORPORATION, COUNTY OF FORSYTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WRIGHT v. [FNU] CO. DANFORD
as 1:2023cv00456
Plaintiff: KAYIE SHAUNE WRIGHT
Defendant: [FNU] CO. DANFORD, JOHN DOE, [FNU] ATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OUTEN v. USA
as 1:2023cv00390
Petitioner: JOHN PAUL OUTEN
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
THOMAS v. JOHN DOE 1-4
as 1:2023cv00372
Plaintiff: Dalveccio T. Thomas
Defendant: John Doe 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?