Cases 31 - 40 of 132
HOLMAN v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOL LAW ENFORCEMENT, ET AL.,
as 1:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
QUENTON DAMON HOLMAN
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOL LAW ENFORCEMENT, A.T. WIGGS, K. KLUTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. DOE
as 1:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. LEE et al
as 1:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON and ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMAR ANDERSON
Defendant:
LEE, SALISBURY CORR. INST., RITHIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. DOE
as 1:2022cv01107
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONTGOMERY v. BLUE et al
as 1:2022cv01134
Plaintiff:
RODNEY LEE MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
MR. BLUE and MR. JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONTGOMERY v. HUNT et al
as 1:2022cv00801
Plaintiff:
RODNEY LEE MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
SERGEANT GARY HUNT, SERGEANT REESE and MR. JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POLK v. STANLY COUNTY et al
as 1:2022cv00613
Plaintiff:
BRANDON CHRISHON POLK
Defendant:
STANLY COUNTY, STANLY COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, J. CRISCO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. SULLIVAN et al
as 1:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
RICKY BUTLER
Defendant:
WARDEN SULLIVAN, WARDEN RAMOS, CAPTAIN FRINGLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
WARDLOW v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2022cv00416
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEWIS WARDLOW
Defendant:
CATHRINE THOMPSON, OFFICER REYES, OFFICER JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUMP v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 1:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY CRUMP
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
