Cases 81 - 90 of 10,042
THOMPSON v. CITY OF DURHAM et al
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
BRANDON E. THOMPSON
Defendant:
CITY OF DURHAM, DURHAM COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANGELA ASHBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMALLWOOD v. SAMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
LAMARQUIS SMALLWOOD
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, MS. SAMPSON, SGT. BETHAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VELEZ v. USA
as 1:2024cv00245
Petitioner:
JEFFREY ALAN VELEZ, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ARNOLD v. USBOP
as 1:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS D. ARNOLD
Defendant:
USBOP STAFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
MARTIN v. BIRKHEAD et al
as 1:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
BRANDON OTHA MARTIN
Defendant:
CHARLES F. BIRKHEAD, M. SPENCER, GLASSCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCLARY v. STEWARD et al
as 1:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
RONALD MCCLARY
Defendant:
FNU STEWARD, FNU HARGROVE, SERGEANT RANSOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWNING v. MECKLENBURG COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
PIERRE BROWNING
Defendant:
MECKLENBURG COUNTY and DAVID LANGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPRAUVE v. UNKNOWN OFFICIAL AT DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
JON C. SPRAUVE
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICIAL AT DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and UNKNOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JUMPER v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
RICHARD D. JUMPER, JR.
Defendant:
TODD ISHEE, PETER BUCHHOLTZ, KENO WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAMBERS v. SHU STAFF AT UNITED STATES PENITENTARY
as 1:2024cv00309
Petitioner:
MARCUS DONTRIEL CHAMBERS
Respondent:
SHU STAFF AT UNITED STATES PENITENTARY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
