Cases 1 - 10 of 78
RUTLEDGE v. RUTLEDGE-CHAMBERS et al
as 1:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. RUTLEDGE
Defendant:
SHANNON RUTLEDGE-CHAMBERS, DUKE UNIVERSITY, RHINE RESEARCH CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
WOODBERRY v. MICHAEL et al
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
MANDRAIL JAMAR WOODBERRY
Defendant:
JUDGE MICHAEL, JOHN BANDLE, M. ODOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. CITY OF DURHAM et al
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
BRANDON E. THOMPSON
Defendant:
CITY OF DURHAM, DURHAM COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANGELA ASHBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODBERRY v. MICHAEL et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
MANDRAIL JAMAR WOODBERRY
Defendant:
JUDGE MICHAEL, ADA JOHN BANDLE, M. ODOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TYLER v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
DAVID B. SMITH, THE FORSYTH COUNTY L.E.D.C, ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HALL v. NORTH CAROLINA ADULT CORRECTION et al
as 1:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE HALL
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA ADULT CORRECTION, SGT WILLIAM OWENS, JOSHUA ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. USA
as 1:2023cv00024
Petitioner:
GREGORY DEVON HALL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MEYERS v. MCDOWELL
as 1:2022cv01030
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
JOYCE MCDOWELL, P.R.E.A. CORRDINATOR MS. COVINGTON, CHIEF AND SUPERVISOR OF THE PREA OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. MCLAIN
as 1:2022cv01009
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE HALL
Defendant:
JAMES MCCAIN and JAMES MCLAIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
