Cases 1 - 10 of 12
ANDERSON v. NOVANT HEALTH et al
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MARQUAVIOUS LAMAR ANDERSON
Defendant:
NOVANT HEALTH, DAVIE COUNTY, DAVIE COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT DETENTION CENTER, JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOSCO v. RICHARDSON et al
as 1:2023cv00675
Plaintiff:
SANTINO DOMINICK BOSCO, JR.
Defendant:
RICHARDSON, GULYAS and BEN ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TYLER v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
DAVID B. SMITH, THE FORSYTH COUNTY L.E.D.C, ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEAL v. ANDERSON
as 1:2023cv00285
Petitioner:
GLENN WHICKER NEAL, JR.
Respondent:
BEN ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NEAL v. ANDERSON
as 1:2023cv00284
Petitioner:
GLENN WHICKER NEAL, JR.
Respondent:
BEN ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANDERSON v. LEE et al
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMA ANDERSON and ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMAR ANDERSON
Defendant:
LEE, SALISBURY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, HONEYCUTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. LEE et al
as 1:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON and ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMAR ANDERSON
Defendant:
LEE, SALISBURY CORR. INST., RITHIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STANBACK v. STRADER et al
as 1:2019cv00122
Plaintiff:
CHADNEY STANBACK
Defendant:
N. COBBLER and BEN STRADER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURTON v. PERSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00976
Defendant:
JOHN WALKER, JIMMY WILBORN, BEN MASSEY and others
Plaintiff:
JASMINE L. BURTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PICKENS v. SHANAHAN et al
as 1:2016cv00251
Plaintiff:
BRANDON MICHAEL PICKENS
Defendant:
KIERAN J. SHANAHAN, W. DAVID GUICE, ROBERT C. LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
