Cases 1 - 10 of 43
MORRIS v. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00395
Respondent:
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS, N.C. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and MARY LOCKLEAR
Petitioner:
MATTHEW MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATTHEWS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00305
Petitioner:
JUSTIN GUNSAIN MATTHEWS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
LITTLE v. GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2023cv00832
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MATTHEW ALEXANDER LITTLE
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE and GUILFORD COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NELSON v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL NELSON
Defendant:
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, Magistrate Carter, SHERIFF SAMUEL SCOTT PAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RICHARDSON-BEY v. SHELTON et al
as 1:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
LEROY RICHARDSON-BEY
Defendant:
WARDEN M. SHELTON, SGT. WATSON, WARDEN BRAYBOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATTHEWS v. USA
as 1:2022cv00938
Petitioner:
JUSTIN GUNSIAN MATTHEWS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BRIM v. USA
as 1:2022cv00924
Petitioner:
PAUL MATTHEW BRIM
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MOORE v. HUDSON et al
as 1:2022cv00688
Plaintiff:
CHIVALRY MOORE
Defendant:
ORLANDO F. HUDSON, JR., MATTHEW COOK, CHRIS J. VERMILLION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEELE v. LAVALLEY et al
as 1:2021cv00902
Plaintiff:
JA'SHOUN ANDREW STEELE
Defendant:
DETECTIVE MATTHEW LAVALLEY and DETECTIVE KARL A. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEELE v. LAVALLEY et al
as 1:2021cv00357
Defendant:
DETECTIVE MATTHEW LAVALLEY and DETECTIVE KARL A. WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
JASHOUN ANDREW STEELE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
