Cases 91 - 100 of 867
MALACHI v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2021cv00580
Petitioner:
KAREEM DAQUAN MALACHI
Respondent:
ERIC HOOKS and TIMOTHY D. MOOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BREAM v. VEP HEALTHCARE, INC.
as 1:2021cv00554
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. BREAM, M.D.
Defendant:
VEP HEALTHCARE, INC.
TYLER v. GREENWOOD et al
as 1:2021cv00529
Defendant:
PAUL A. SHANNER, DYLAN W. GREENWOOD, J. CLARK FISCHER and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP v. STANLY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2021cv00501
Defendant:
Stanly County Board of Commissioners and STANLY COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Plaintiff:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS and CELLCO PARTNERSHIP doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TYLER v. WARREN et al
as 1:2021cv00496
Defendant:
JAMES O'NELL, DYLAN W. GREENWOOD, RANDOLPH and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYLER v. GREENWOOD et al
as 1:2021cv00488
Defendant:
DYLAN W. GREENWOOD, PROSECTORIAL DISTRICT, J. CLARK FISCHER and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COX et al v. GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.
as 1:2021cv00481
Plaintiff:
FELICIA MCILWAIN, JOE OVERCASH, WESLEY H. WILLIAMS and others
Defendant:
GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
TYLER v. WELCH et al
as 1:2021cv00473
Defendant:
SARA Q. LOBNER, KELLY WELCH, WILLIAM L. OSTEAN, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUNCH v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00467
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA WOMEN'S HEALTH, LLC, TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MARY BUNCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PIERCE v. BYNAM et al
as 1:2021cv00395
Defendant:
CLARENCE BIRKHEAD, ROBERT MCCASLIN, JESSICA TORRES and others
Plaintiff:
CORIANTE LAQUELLE PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
