Cases 11 - 20 of 56
BOWMAN v. SURRY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2020cv00415
Defendant:
SURRY COUNTY JAIL, B. COLE, CINDY FELTS and others
Plaintiff:
SHANE DOUGLAS BOWMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00394
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JENKINS, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GRIFFITH v. SURRY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2020cv00223
Defendant:
SGT. RANDY JENKINS, LT. RANDALL SHELTON, SURRY COUNTY JAIL and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GRIFFITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LIPPS v. SURRY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2020cv00221
Defendant:
SGT. RANDY JENKINS, LT. RANDALL SHELTON, SHERIFF STEVE HIATT and others
Plaintiff:
JERAMEY LIPPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LIPPS v. SURRY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2020cv00207
Defendant:
SURRY COUNTY JAIL, SGT. RANDY JENKINS, CINDY FELTS and others
Plaintiff:
JERAMEY LIPPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOINES, ET AL v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC et al
as 1:2019cv00489
Defendant:
TMX FINANCE OF VIRGINIA, INC, TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC, TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC and others
Plaintiff:
AARON GOINS, ET AL, ELAINE T. JOHNSON, KEVIN HORTON and others
Counter Defendant:
JAMES BRADSHAW, ANDREW JOHNSON, DAVID ELLISON and others
Petitioner:
ANDREW H. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
TULIP v. JENKINS et al
as 1:2018cv01012
Plaintiff:
DILLON S. TULIP
Defendant:
ANTHONY LATI JENKINS, CHEESEMAN LLC and ZUMSTEIN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JENKINS v. USA
as 1:2018cv00458
Petitioner:
THOMAS BRANTLEY JENKINS, II
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JENKINS v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC
as 1:2017cv00844
Plaintiff:
JOHN LAMAR JENKINS
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
