Cases 11 - 20 of 36
PADRON v. USA
as 1:2017cv00651
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JUAN GONZALEZ PADRON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RENTERIA-GONZALEZ v. USA
as 1:2017cv00629
Petitioner:
LEONEL RENTERIA-GONZALEZ
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RENTERIA-GONZALEZ v. USA
as 1:2017cv00402
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
LEONEL RENTERIA-GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
CERRATO et al v. DURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 1:2016cv01431
Defendant:
DURHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION and SSC SERVICE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Plaintiff:
LILIAM BUSTILLO CERRATO , MARIA JUAREZ REGINO , YOLANDA PAVON GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ORTIZ v. USA
as 1:2016cv00674
Petitioner:
ESTELLA GONZALEZ ORTIZ
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
GONZALEZ v. FORSYTH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
as 1:2015cv01043
Plaintiff:
FLORA RIANO GONZALEZ
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, CURTIS CHEEKS and ROBINETTA BLACKWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. OSBORNE, ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00348
Plaintiff:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
CATHY OWENS OSBORNE, SHARON HELMS, DEBORAH O. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
GONZALEZ-CASTRO v. MARSHALL et al
as 1:2013cv01120
Petitioner:
RICARDO ABRAHAM GONZALEZ-CASTRO
Respondent:
BOB W. MARSHALL and KIERAN J. SHANAHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SANCHEZ et al v. TRUSE TRUCKING, INC.
as 1:2013cv00415
Plaintiff:
ERICK GARCIA SANCHEZ , JOSUE CHAN CHAG , MIGUEL A. ROJAS TUMALAN and others
Defendant:
TRUSE TRUCKING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
LOPEZ v. COMPANY OF FOOD 4 LESS et al
as 1:2012cv01170
Plaintiff:
JOSE GUADALUPE LOPEZ
Defendant:
COMPANY OF FOOD 4 LESS, MARTIN LOPEZ, HUMBERTO GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
