Cases 21 - 30 of 122
ALEXANDER v. BOYLES et al
as 1:2022cv00912
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ALEXANDER
Defendant:
M.G. BOYLES, A.C. SHORES, III and JULIA GULLETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MUSGROVE v. ALEXANDER CORRECTIONAL
as 1:2022cv00893
Plaintiff:
SAQUAN MUSGROVE
Defendant:
ALEXANDER CORRECTIONAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLAYTON et al v. WELLS et al
as 1:2022cv00908
Plaintiff:
GAIL H. CLAYTON and THOMAS A. CLAYTON
Defendant:
ALEXANDER WELLS and ALLYSON P. WELLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
WILD v. GREEN GARDEN LANDSCAPING, LLC.
as 1:2022cv00782
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER L WILD and ALEXANDER L. WILD
Defendant:
GREEN GARDEN LANDSCAPING, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
FORD v. USA
as 1:2022cv00627
Petitioner:
FURMAN ALEXANDER FORD
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. EXTRAORDINARY CATERING, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00671
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC., BEECHWOOD MUSIC CORPORATION, RICK SPRINGFIELD MUSIC and others
Defendant:
EXTRAORDINARY CATERING, LLC doing business as REDD'S ON UNION, JOSEF ALEXANDER, YASMINE ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
MCCRAE v. USA
as 1:2022cv00023
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER LEMONT MCCRAE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MCPHERSON v. USA
as 1:2021cv00846
Petitioner:
JERRAD ALEXANDER MCPHERSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ALEXANDER v. AUTEN et al
as 1:2021cv00611
Plaintiff:
WITT ALEXANDER
Defendant:
KEVIN AUTEN, NATHANIEL L. PHILLIPS, RODNEY S. MAHALEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILD v. MOSQUITO TEK et al
as 1:2021cv00129
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER LEWIS WILD
Defendant:
MOSQUITO TEK doing business as ECO TEK TERMITE AND PEST CONTROL OF VIRGINIA BEACH and PENNER WEB DESIGN LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
