Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 21 - 30 of 32
CURRY v. HERITAGE HEALTHCARE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00638
Plaintiff: BARBARA LINDSEY CURRY
Defendant: HERITAGE HEALTHCARE and SHERRY BLAKELY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
VAN DYKE v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2014cv00578
Plaintiff: PROPHET PREACHER PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE
Defendant: ROGER JAMES DAVIS, BRUSE BURGER, CHARLES VANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURRY v. USA
as 1:2011cv01099
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: MARCUS MAYHEW CURRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JOHNSON v. CURRY et al
as 1:2011cv00852
Plaintiff: WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant: BRENT CURRY, MIKE FUQUAY, BURLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZUNIGA v. THE CITY OF BURLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al
as 1:2011cv00222
Plaintiff: FERNANDO ZUNIGA
Defendant: THE CITY OF BURLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Sgt. BRETT CURRIE and MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CURRY, et al v. STARMOUNT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2010cv00559
Defendant: STARMOUNT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.
Plaintiff: MICHELLE CURRY and WILLIAM SHAWN BOWLING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Contract Insurance
JOHNSON v. CURRY et al
as 1:2010cv00499
Plaintiff: WAYNE THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant: BRENT CURRY, JULIAN DOBY and R.M. FUQUAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURRIE v. CREDITORS FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC
as 1:2010cv00262
Plaintiff: CHRISTINE CURRIE
Defendant: CREDITORS FINANCIAL GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CURRY v. JACKSON
as 1:2008cv00590
Petitioner: RODERICK YOUNG CURRY, JR
Respondent: RICK JACKSON
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CURRIE v. USA
as 1:2008cv00252
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: STEVEN LAWRENCE CURRIE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?