Cases 21 - 30 of 126
MARSHALL v. WELLS
as 1:2020cv00824
Respondent:
BRYAN K. WELLS
Petitioner:
RAYMOND C. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MARSHALL v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00773
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
JAY MARSHALL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
ENGINEERED CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL, LLC v. MARSHALL EXCELSIOR COMPANY
as 1:2020cv00743
Defendant:
MARSHALL EXCELSIOR COMPANY
Plaintiff:
ENGINEERED CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
AYERS v. BROWN et al
as 1:2020cv00504
Defendant:
DENNIS G. BROWN and MIKE P. MARSHALL
Plaintiff:
TERRY ALLEN AYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ACCORDIUS HEALTH LLC et al v. THOMAS DEL MARSHALL et al
as 1:2020cv00464
Plaintiff:
Accordius Health, LLC, Naftali Zanziper, The Portopiccolo Group, LLC and others
Defendant:
Robert Leroy Whitlatch, by and through Attorney-in-Fact Loretta Hair and Thomas Del Marshall, by and through Attorney-In-Fact Melissa Stirewalt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RICHARDS et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00347
Plaintiff:
ADRIENNE RICHARDS, KHALIAH GLANTON, ASHLEY IFILL and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TMX FINANCE OF VIRGINIA, INC. and TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BATTLE v. FORDHAM et al
as 1:2020cv00043
Defendant:
M. CASINO, MARSHALL PIKE, WANDA CARLISLE and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH A. BATTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BYRD v. USA
as 1:2019cv01189
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
THOMAS MARSHALL BYRD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MARSHALL v. WELLS
as 1:2019cv01137
Respondent:
BRYAN K. WELLS
Petitioner:
RAYMOND C. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FAULKNER v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
as 1:2019cv01096
Petitioner:
ALVIN FAULKNER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
