Cases 31 - 40 of 57
PIERCE v. ROTH et al
as 1:2013cv00158
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. PIERCE, SR.
Defendant:
RICHARD ROTH and UNIVERSAL STEEL OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
PIERCE v. PIERCE
as 1:2012cv00743
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA A PIERCE
Defendant:
TORNELLO F PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00548
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PIERCE v. USA
as 1:2012cv00484
Petitioner:
GERARD MCKINSEY PIERCE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PIERCE EL-BEY v. FLETCHER, et al
as 1:2011cv00901
Defendant:
KIMBERLY M FLETCHER , WALLACE WADE DIXON, JAMES DOUG HENDERSON and others
Plaintiff:
NOBLE TORNELLO FONTAINE PIERCE EL-BEY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
MOORE v. BRYANT et al
as 1:2011cv00735
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM EVERETTE MOORE
Defendant:
SHERRY MAE BRYANT , AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY , SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
PIERCE EL-BEY v. CITY OF THOMASVILLE
as 1:2011cv00413
Plaintiff:
TORNELLO FONTAINE PIERCE EL-BEY
Defendant:
CITY OF THOMASVILLE, WAYNE L. MICHAEL, CITY OF THOMASVILLE POLICE DEPT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
EL-BEY v. CITY OF GREENSBORO et al
as 1:2010cv00572
Plaintiff:
TORNELLO FONTAINE PIERCE EL-BEY
Defendant:
CITY OF GREENSBORO, CITY OF GREENSBORO POLICE DEPT, HAROLD THOMAS JARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
PIERCE EL-BEY v. CITY OF GREENSBORO et al
as 1:2010cv00291
Plaintiff:
TORNELLO FONTAINE PIERCE EL-BEY
Defendant:
CITY OF GREENSBORO, CITY OF GREENSBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT, DISTRICT 4 POLICE OFFICER BADGE # 110 E and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
