Cases 31 - 40 of 52
PEREZ v. USA
as 1:2015cv00611
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
CARLOS FABIAN PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PEREZ v. VESUVIO'S II PIZZA & GRILL, INC et al
as 1:2015cv00519
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
GIOVANNI SCOTTI D'ABBUSCO, ALFREDO CAPUANO and VESUVIO'S PIZZA & SUBS 2, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PEREZ v. PRECISION NETWORK, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00406
Plaintiff:
JESUS ALEJANDRO PEREZ
Defendant:
PRECISION NETWORK, LLC, PRECISION NETWORKS, INC and FRANKIE BONETT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
TAY v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2014cv00802
Plaintiff:
TAY
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, MARISSA PISARICK, RANDOLPH NAOMI and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
BLACKBURN et al v. TOWN OF KERNERSVILLE et al
as 1:2014cv00560
Defendant:
TOWN OF KERNERSVILLE , J. L. REDDEN and KERNERSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
TERESA BLACKBURN and ADRIAN MARTINEZ-PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PEREZ v. PERRY
as 1:2014cv00311
Petitioner:
JUAN CELSO ZAVALETA PEREZ
Respondent:
FRANK L. PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
INTERNATIONAL LABOR MANAGEMENT CORPORATION v. PEREZ et al
as 1:2014cv00231
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL LABOR MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
Defendant:
THOMAS E. PEREZ and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
PEREZ v. PANCHO VILLA OF SALISBURY, INC., et al
as 1:2014cv00166
Defendant:
PANCHO VILLA OF SALISBURY, INC. and JUAN S. ZARRABAL
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ESPINOZA et al v. MEX-AM CAFE LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00030
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO ESPINOZA and LAURA PEREZ
Defendant:
MEX-AM CAFE LLC and ROBERTO GALVAN
All_defendant:
Jennifer L. Reutter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PEREZ v. MESSER et al
as 1:2013cv00655
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
MITCHELL W. MESSER, WESCO SIGNES, INC. RETIREMENT PLAN, WESCO SIGNS INC HEALTH PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
