Cases 31 - 40 of 23,900
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
MCALLISTER v. OFFICIALS AT FORSYTH COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 1:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Defendant:
OFFICIALS AT FORSYTH COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOSKINSON v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
BRANDON HOSKINSON
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
WILLIAMS v. BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2024cv00394
Petitioner:
DARYL WILLIAMS
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, JESSICA SAGE and BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MORRIS v. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00395
Respondent:
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS, N.C. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and MARY LOCKLEAR
Petitioner:
MATTHEW MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. RANSOM et al
as 1:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
KAYIE SHAUNE DEVORE WRIGHT
Defendant:
GENO RANSOM, FNU POTRELLA, FNU L. BULLARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARANZA v. PYLES et al
as 1:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
JOSE M. CARANZA
Defendant:
OFFICER PYLES, OFFICER SHAFFER, WARDEN DAVID CASSIDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVERA v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
VICTOR RIVERA
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
