Cases 41 - 50 of 58
HAYES v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2012cv00844
Petitioner:
LEANNE E. HAYES
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HAYES, et al v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
as 1:2012cv00137
Plaintiff:
VICKY P. HAYES and ARLIE WAYNE HAYES
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ATKINSON, et al v. OMTRON USA, LLC
as 1:2011cv00910
Plaintiff:
KENT ATKINSON , RHONDA ATKINSON , RODNEY BROWN and others
Defendant:
OMTRON USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HAYES v. USA
as 1:2011cv00800
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
KENNETH RAY HAYES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
FERGUSON et al v. OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORPORATION
as 1:2011cv00670
Plaintiff:
WALTER FERGUSON and CHARLENE FERGUSON
Defendant:
OPTION ONE MORTGAGE CORP., AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVICING, INC., U.S. BANK, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BURGESS v. EBAY, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv00193
Plaintiff:
ALBERT C. BURGESS, JR.
Defendant:
EBAY, INC., PAYPAL, INC., GOOGLE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PYRTLE v. HAYES, et al
as 1:2010cv00683
Defendant:
Henry McThadden Hayes, Mark S. Martin, Gene Setliff and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Pyrtle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HAYES v. GGP-FOUR SEASONS, L.L.C., et al
as 1:2010cv00423
Plaintiff:
CHARRAN M. HAYES
Defendant:
GGP-FOUR SEASONS, L.L.C. , GENERAL GROWTH PROPERTIES, INC. , MYDATT SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
HAYES v. GGP-FOUR SEASONS, L.L.C., et al
as 1:2010cv00425
Defendant:
Mydatt Services, Inc. d/b/a Valor Security Services , GGP-Four Seasons, L.L.C., General Growth Properties, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
CHARRAN M. HAYES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
HAYES v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv00379
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL M. HAYES
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
