Cases 51 - 60 of 105
COVINGTON et al v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2015cv00399
Plaintiff:
SANDRA LITTLE COVINGTON , HERMAN BENTHLE LEWIS, JR. , VIOLA RYALS FIGUEROA and others
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ROBERT A. RUCHO, PHILIP E. BERGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANY V. THOMAS LINDERMAN GRAHAM, INC.
as 1:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
THOMAS LINDERMAN GRAHAM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
GRAHAM V. UNITED STATES ANTI-DOPING AGENCY
as 1:2016cv01025
Plaintiff:
TREVOR GRAHAM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ANTI-DOPING AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHAVEZ. T & B MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL.
as 1:2016cv01019
Defendant:
T & B MANAGEMENT, LLC and T & B CONCEPTS OF HICKORY, LLC
Plaintiff:
VANESSA CHAVEZ , AMY BERLAK , MELISSA GRAHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
GRAHAM v. USA
as 1:2016cv00765
Petitioner:
CARL KOTAY GRAHAM
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
GRAHAM v. BENTSEN, et al
as 1:2016cv00612
Plaintiff:
JAMES GRAHAM
Defendant:
TIM E. BENTSEN , CHARLES A BLIXT , LYNN CRUMP-CAINE and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00577
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, C. C. BLAKE, R. M. ASHLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00335
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES LICENSE AND THEFT DIVISION, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00287
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, K. D. MACKEY, C. C. BLAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00284
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., K. D. MACKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
