Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00240
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
ALEXANDER v. HOLCOMB We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00691
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER ISAAC ALEXANDER
Defendant: BETH W. HOLCOMB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALEXANDER v. YADKIN COUNTY COURTHOUSE
as 1:2023cv00608
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER ISAAC ALEXANDER
Defendant: YADKIN COUNTY COURTHOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH-EL BEY v. MOORE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2022cv01004
Plaintiff: ROBERT A. SMITH-EL BEY
Defendant: MOORE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, MOORE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE/DEPT., BILL FLINT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ASHEBORO DRUG COMPANY, INC. et al.
as 1:2022cv00522
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ASHEBORO DRUG COMPANY, INC., ISAAC BRADY, III, ISAAC BRADY, IV and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
LLOYD v. THE UNITED STATES
as 1:2021cv00569
Plaintiff: ANDREW ISAAC LLOYD
Defendant: THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOHNSON v. USA
as 1:2021cv00547
Petitioner: DION ISAAC JOHNSON
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ISAAC v. USA
as 1:2021cv00092
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: QUADEER TERECK ISAAC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
STURDIVANT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv00030
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: ISAAC NOREL STURDIVANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JAMES v. N.C. DPS PRISONS et al
as 1:2019cv00997
Defendant: ISAAC ROGERS, N.C. DPS PRISONS and AMANDA COBB
Plaintiff: TERMAINE M. JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?