Cases 1 - 10 of 14
LARSON v. GACEK et al
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY COBY LARSON
Defendant:
GARY GACEK and THE CITY OF CONCORD, NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
TAYARA v. LARSON et al
as 1:2022cv00633
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA TAYARA
Defendant:
TIMOTHY COBY LARSON and CITY OF CONCORD, NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ELC TRANSPORT, INC. v. THE LARSON GROUP, INC.
as 1:2020cv00964
Defendant:
THE LARSON GROUP, INC. doing business as PETERBILT OF CHARLOTTE
Plaintiff:
ELC TRANSPORT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, JEFFREY BAREFOOT, R. THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2017cv00810
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, R. M. ASHLEY, RON SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. MACKEY et al
as 1:2017cv00456
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
K. D. MACKEY, C.C. BLAKE, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, C. C. BLAKE, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv01408
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., K. D. MACKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv01129
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., K. D. MACKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. LARSON et al
as 1:2016cv00347
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
STIG LARSON, FAYETTEVILLE, N.C. POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNKNOWN LT SUPERVISOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
