Cases 1 - 10 of 10
FORDHAM v. KELLER et al
as 1:2013cv00617
Plaintiff:
CHRIS FORDHAM
Defendant:
ALVIN KELLER, JR., KIERAN SHANNAHAN, JOEL HERRON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEGETTE v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2012cv01011
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS DECOE LEGETTE
Defendant:
ROBERT C. LEWIS, ALVIN KELLER, JR., J. BRINGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONTEHERMOSO v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2012cv00302
Plaintiff:
HAIBER MONTEHERMOSO
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF PRISONS, PIEDMONT CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEACH v. KELLER
as 1:2011cv00345
Petitioner:
DARRYL DAMON LEACH
Respondent:
ALVIN KELLER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LINDSAY v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2011cv00067
Defendant:
ROBERT C. LEWIS, S. PATTERSON, M. MARTIN and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK JAVON LINDSAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATKINS v. KELLER
as 1:2009cv00536
Petitioner:
BILLY TODD WATKINS
Respondent:
ALVIN KELLER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WATKINS v. KELLER
as 1:2009cv00451
Petitioner:
BILLY TODD WATKINS
Respondent:
ALVIN KELLER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THACKER v. KELLER
as 1:2009cv00419
Petitioner:
ROBERT LEE THACKER
Respondent:
ALVIN KELLER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MONTEHERMOSO V. NC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ET AL
as 1:2009cv00393
Plaintiff:
HAIBER MONTEHERMOSO
Defendant:
NC DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NC Division of Prisons, PIEDMONT CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CASSELL v. KELLER
as 1:2009cv00260
Petitioner:
PAUL D. CASSELL
Respondent:
ALVIN KELLER, JR.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
