Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 87
BRYANT v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff: CARAN BRYANT
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
BRYANT et al v. EASTWOOD CONSTRUCTION, LLC
as 1:2023cv00637
Plaintiff: JAMES L. BRYANT, JR. and SHARON R. BRYANT
Defendant: EASTWOOD CONSTRUCTION, LLC doing business as EASTWOOD HOMES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
NARCISSE v. USA
as 1:2023cv00251
Petitioner: BRYANT RENE NARCISSE
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BRYANT v. STEIN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00077
Plaintiff: AMY BRYANT, M.D.
Defendant: JOSHUA H. STEIN, JEFF NIEMAN, KODY H. KINSLEY and others
Intervenor Defendant: Timothy K. Moore and Philip E. Berger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
BRYANT v. USA
as 1:2022cv01045
Petitioner: ANTONIO TOMAR BRYANT
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MURPHY et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00971
Plaintiff: ADRIAN MURPHY, AKEYA SIMPKINS, ALAN YOUNG and others
Defendant: TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TITLEMAX OF GEORGIA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
NARCISSE v. USA
as 1:2022cv00959
Petitioner: BRYANT RENE NARCISSE
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BRYANT v. USA
as 1:2022cv00090
Petitioner: ANTONIO TOMAR BRYANT
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BRYANT v. USA
as 1:2021cv00958
Petitioner: ANTONIO TOMAR BRYANT
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
YCO v. GARY et al
as 1:2021cv00885
Plaintiff: SUSAN ANNE YCO
Defendant: BRYANT DEXTER GARY, U.S. XPRESS LEASING, INC. and U.S. XPRESS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?