Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MURPHY et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00971
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN MURPHY, AKEYA SIMPKINS, ALAN YOUNG and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TITLEMAX OF GEORGIA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
BATTLE v. FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER
as 1:2022cv00550
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SCHARRELL BATTLE
Defendant:
FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BATTLE v. FORDHAM et al
as 1:2021cv00692
Plaintiff:
KENNETH A. BATTLE
Defendant:
MERCEDES T. FORDHAM, JOSHUA C. DENNIS, SERGEANT WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATTLE v. FORDHAM et al
as 1:2020cv00043
Defendant:
M. CASINO, MARSHALL PIKE, WANDA CARLISLE and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH A. BATTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORDON v. DARCY
as 1:2019cv00703
Plaintiff:
CHAUNCY D. GORDON
Defendant:
ANDREW DARCY, RAYFORD K. ADAMS, III, UNITED STATE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. BATTLE
as 1:2011mc00031
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Defendant:
CARMEN J. BATTLE
YOUNG v. NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURE AND TECHNICAL STATE UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2008cv00894
Plaintiff:
LEE YOUNG
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURE AND TECHNICAL STATE UNIVERSITY, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA and STANLEY BATTLE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
MILLER v. WOOD et al
as 1:2007cv00415
Plaintiff:
TACARLOS ANTIGO MILLER
Defendant:
DON G. WOOD, BOYD BENNETT, THEODIS BECK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
