Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY v. HITACHI VANTARA CORPORATION
as 1:2019cv01168
Plaintiff: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY
Defendant: Hitachi Vantara Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADONIS v. BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY
as 1:2019cv01109
Defendant: BB&T CORPORATION and BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY
Plaintiff: LISA ADONIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY V. SOLEIL ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, ET AL.
as 1:2017cv00481
Plaintiff: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY
Defendant: SOLEIL ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC , MCALEE LEMENE and KRISTINA LEMENE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY v. FUGETT et al
as 1:2017mc00019
Plaintiff: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY
Defendant: RALPH F. FUGETT, JR.
SMITH et al v. BB&T CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00841
Plaintiff: BREWSTER SMITH, JR , DORIS KIROUAC , CHRISTINA HAWKS and others
Defendant: BB&T CORPORATION , BB&T CORPORATION EMPLOYEE BENEFITS PLAN COMMITTEE , BB&T CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00535
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
BARRAS v. BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY
as 1:2009cv00678
Plaintiff: LACY BARRAS
Defendant: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00665
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Type: Civil Rights None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00037
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?