Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
VAUGHN v. DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01031
Plaintiff:
CARL DAVIS VAUGHN, JR
Defendant:
DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC and BRIAN D. SAVOY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Petition for Removal: SEC Act
DUKES v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01023
Plaintiff:
TROY DUKES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00957
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
FRANKLIN v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2023cv00833
Plaintiff:
JOY G. FRANKLIN
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, THE RETIREMENT BOARD FOR DUKE UNIVERSITY and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
LANCE v. DUKE UNIVERSITY
as 1:2023cv00666
Plaintiff:
Dr. Rachel Marie Lance
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
