Cases 1 - 10 of 10
J M SMITH CORPORATION et al v. INMAR RX SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
J M SMITH CORPORATION doing business as SMITH DRUG COMPANY and BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
INMAR RX SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
SMITH v. ATRIUM HEALTH et al
as 1:2023cv00702
Plaintiff:
KEVIN M. SMITH
Defendant:
ATRIUM HEALTH, NORTHEAST MEDICAL CENTER, WHITLEY ENTERPRISES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
SMITH v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2020cv00246
Plaintiff:
KEVIN M. SMITH
Defendant:
CABARRUS COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA, UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
PHILLIPS v. NAPHCARE, INC., ET AL.
as 1:2018cv00974
Defendant:
MICHAEL VAN SICKLE, IVY MANNING, AMY JO ROSENTHAL and others
Plaintiff:
ROBIN DENISE PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NICHOLS v. SMITH
as 1:2018cv00261
Petitioner:
STACY TYREE NICHOLS
Respondent:
DONNA M. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00198
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STEPHENS v. KLINE et al
as 1:2012cv00161
Petitioner:
TRAVIS OTIS STEPHENS
Defendant:
TRACY KLINE, MARK MCCULLOUGH, LARRY E. KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. SMITH
as 1:2011mc00008
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Defendant:
JERRY M. SMITH
SMITH v. U.S. GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2010cv00673
Plaintiff:
KEVIN M. SMITH
Defendant:
U.S. GOVERNMENT, U.S. TREASUREY DEPARTMENT, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6212
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00030
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
