Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SONG v. CHERTOFF
as 1:2007cv00708
Plaintiff:
YAN SONG and QING ZHANG
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, EVELYN UPCHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
ATIF et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 1:2007cv00690
Plaintiff:
SAID ATIF
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, ROSEMARY MELVILLE, RICHARD GOTTLIEB and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
ABU DAMES v. CHERTOFF et al
as 1:2007cv00304
Plaintiff:
ASHRAF MAHMOUD ABU DAMES
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO GONZALES, EVELYN UPCHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GU et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 1:2007cv00286
Plaintiff:
HONGBIN GU and XIAOFEI WANG
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO GONZALES, EVELYN UPCHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
LU v. CHERTOFF et al
as 1:2007cv00057
Plaintiff:
JUN LU
Defendant:
Secretary MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, DONALD NEUFELD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SUN et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 1:2007cv00040
Plaintiff:
QIAN SUN and SHUANG LI
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO GONZALEZ, EVELYN UPCHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
LI v. CHERTOFF, et al
as 1:2007cv00006
Plaintiff:
PENG LI and FANG XU
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, EVELYN M. UPCHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
