Cases 1 - 8 of 8
ALLEN v. COOPER et al
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
ROY COOPER, N.C. STATE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, JENNIFER ELWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ALLEN v. EVANS et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2022cv00664
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
N. EVANS, N.C. STATE HIGHWAY PATROL, JENNIFER TALLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
SHARPE v. N.C. STATE
as 1:2022cv00596
Petitioner:
JERRY L. SHARPE
Respondent:
N.C. STATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ARROYO et al v. SOUTHWOOD REALTY COMPANY et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2021cv00219
Plaintiff:
VALERIE ARROYO and DEREK OLIVARIA
Defendant:
SOUTHWOOD REALTY COMPANY, LUZ GORDON, CITY OF CONCORD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RICHARDSON v. CITY OF DURHAM
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2020cv00141
Defendant:
SBI AGENT DANNIE SCOTT FAIRCLOTH, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR KANAWHA PERRY, SAMANTHA ALEX BUCK and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD RAY RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HUNT v. N.C. STATE
as 1:2019cv00888
Petitioner:
WILLIE H. HUNT
Respondent:
N.C. STATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bennett v. N.C. State
as 1:2019cv00778
Respondent:
N.C. STATE
Petitioner:
FRANK T. BENNETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOINER v. PERRY et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2014cv00509
Petitioner:
RAYMOND DAKIM HARRIS JOINER
Respondent:
FRANK PERRY, GEORGE SOLOMON and N.C. STATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.