Cases 1 - 10 of 13
MEYERS v. LOCKLEAR
as 1:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, WILLIAM BULLARD, LT. MR. BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. HAMPTON et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, SGT. MS. NEALLY, CAPTAIN MR. COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHELPS v. USA
as 1:2022cv00133
Petitioner:
TERRANCE RACHON PHELPS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PHELPS v. USA
as 1:2021cv00405
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
TERRANCE RACHON PHELPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PHELPS v. USA
as 1:2019cv00332
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
TERRANCE RACHON PHELPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PHELPS V. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
as 1:2017cv01077
Plaintiff:
JESSICA JUNE PHELPS
Defendant:
BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA et al v. RUCHO et al
as 1:2016cv01164
Plaintiff:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA , WILLIAM COLLINS , ELLIOTT FELDMAN and others
Defendant:
ROBERT A. RUCHO , DAVID R. LEWIS , TIMOTHY K. MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
REYNOLDS INNOVATIONS INC. v. THE ELECTRIC CIGARETTE CO., LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00195
Plaintiff:
REYNOLDS INNOVATIONS INC.
Defendant:
THE ELECTRIC CIGARETTE CO., LLC and VICTORIA PHELPS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
SUPERIOR PERFORMERS, INC., D/B/A NATIONAL AGENTS ALLIANCE V. PHELPS, ET AL. Superior Performers, Inc. d/b/a National Agents Alliance v. Phelps et al
as 1:2015cv00134
Plaintiff:
SUPERIOR PERFORMERS, INC.
Defendant:
RYAN J. PHELPS and BRIDGET M. PHELPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PHELPS v. TOURTELLOT et al
as 1:2014cv00844
Plaintiff:
CALVIN A PHELPS
Defendant:
PETER TOURTELLOT, JOHN NORTHEN, MICHAEL MEBANE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
