Cases 1 - 10 of 17
CARRINGTON v. NEWTON et al
as 1:2022cv00870
Plaintiff:
THEODORE MACON CARRINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
DEBORRAH LYNN NEWTON and OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. AUTEN et al
as 1:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
KEVIN AUTEN, JOHN DOE #2, K-9 OFFICER JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
INGRAM v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2019cv00125
Defendant:
GREGORY DAVIS and FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE
Plaintiff:
RICKY MCKINLEY INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCALLISTER v. TOOMES et al
as 1:2018cv00690
Defendant:
ELISABETH TOOMES, PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, THE 21ST PROSECUTORS OFFICE IN FORSYTH COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON T. MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BENJAMIN v. FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE
as 1:2018cv00685
Defendant:
FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE
Plaintiff:
KELBY DEVONTA BENJAMIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHELTON v. FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE et al
as 1:2016cv01072
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH KENNARD SHELTON
Defendant:
FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE and US ATTORNEYS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DAVIS v. CLOSE et al
as 1:2013cv00779
Plaintiff:
JACOB B. DAVIS
Defendant:
CRANDALL CLOSE and GUILFORD COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
DAVIS v. CLOSE et al
as 1:2013cv00352
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA D. DAVIS
Defendant:
CRANDALL CLOSE and GUILFORD COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
CONRAD v. INGRAM et al
as 1:2012cv01063
Plaintiff:
RANDALL LEE CONRAD
Defendant:
WILLIAM LEE INGRAM and FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER'S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CAMPBELL v. SCOTLAND COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT et al
as 1:2012cv00800
Plaintiff:
KYLE ATLEE CAMPBELL
Defendant:
SCOTLAND COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT and FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
