Cases 1 - 10 of 17
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 518 SHERRON ROAD, DURHAM, DURHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON et al
as 1:2022cv00586
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
518 SHERRON ROAD, DURHAM, DURHAM COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON and 406 KEY ROAD, SANFORD, LEE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
SANFORD v. USA
as 1:2020cv00539
Petitioner:
RODERICK LAMAR SANFORD
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
VIENT v. SANFORD HERALD et al
as 1:2019cv00002
Defendant:
RACHAEL RANEY and SANFORD HERALD
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN VIENT
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
WEISS v. USA
as 1:2017cv00335
Petitioner:
ARTHUR SANFORD WEISS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CITY OF SANFORD v. WINSDSTREAM COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
as 1:2014cv01030
Plaintiff:
CITY OF SANFORD
Defendant:
WINDSTREAM COMMUNICATIONS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANFORD v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv00885
Plaintiff:
RASHIDA NAJA SANFORD
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
RASHID v. CHESTERFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE et al
as 1:2013cv00917
Plaintiff:
HAKIM ABDULLAH RASHID
Defendant:
CHESTERFIELD COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, ROB LEE, SANFORD PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
