Cases 1 - 10 of 54
D.M. v. CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM et al
as 1:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
G. M.
Petitioner:
D. M.
Defendant:
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, Sgt. Kyle Krawczyk, Officer Jamison Keltner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AUSTIN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS AUSTIN
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
BYRD v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv00873
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN WAYNE BYRD
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BYRD v. GUILFORD COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv00872
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN WAYNE BYRD
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY, GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER- GREENSBORO and GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITE v. CHALQ, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
ALEX WHITE
Defendant:
CHALQ, INC., GABE HILL and AUSTIN DICKERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Contract Dispute
BYRD v. NC DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN WAYNE BYRD
Defendant:
NC DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS v. AUSTIN et al
as 1:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
WILMA KAY DAVIS
Defendant:
KEVIN AUSTIN, J. GREGORY MATTHEWS, VALARIE ZACHARY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
PETTIFORD v. GORDON et al
as 1:2022cv00900
Plaintiff:
DERRICK U. PETTIFORD
Defendant:
JAMES G. GORDON, MASON J. HESTER, AUSTIN B. PENDRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NANCE v. SEABOLT et al
as 1:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN JOSHUA NANCE
Defendant:
GREGORY J. SEABOLT, PHILLIP CHEEK and AUNDREA AZELTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
