Cases 11 - 20 of 66
Sapp v. Matthews Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
Alton Sharan Sapp
Defendant:
Matthews Police Department, Town of Matthews NC, Clark A. Pennington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sapp v. Matthews Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv00411
Plaintiff:
Alton Sharan Sapp
Defendant:
Matthews Police Department, Town of Matthews, NC, Clark A. Pennington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gardner v. Town of Mooresville et al
as 5:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Cindy Michelle Gardner
Defendant:
Town of Mooresville and Russell Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Craven v. Novelli et al
as 5:2021cv00174
Plaintiff:
Amy Rhinehart Craven
Defendant:
Christopher Novelli, Alexander Arndt and Town of Mooresville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gates v. Galuski et al
as 3:2021cv00582
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Gates
Defendant:
Thomas Galuski and Town of Pineville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney v. Town of Weaverville, NC, et al
as 1:2021cv00253
Plaintiff:
Austin McKinney
Defendant:
Town of Weaverville, Selena Coffey and Town of Weaverville, NC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Call v. Town of Mooresville, N.C. et al
as 5:2021cv00114
Plaintiff:
David Howard Call
Defendant:
Town of Mooresville, Ronald Campurciani, Damon Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00099
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ra
Downing v. Town of Mooresville et al
as 5:2021cv00056
Defendant:
Josh Barlow, Mooresville, NC, Municipality of, Mooresville, NC, Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Danielle Helena Downing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00054
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
