Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Anderson v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Anderson
Defendant:
The State of North Carolina, The Office of the Governor of North Carolina, Roy Cooper, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00778
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
James v. City of Monroe et al
as 3:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Angelia Nikole James
Defendant:
City of Monroe, Bobby G Kilgore, Marion Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tolbert v. King et al
as 3:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Shantal Tolbert
Defendant:
Willye Mai King, Richelieu Dennis, Yende Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Williams v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2021cv00649
Plaintiff:
Patrice Williams
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, Brandon Ottelin and Tiffany Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00048
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Anderson v. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2020cv00281
Defendant:
Brian Rymil, Department of Justice, Jennifer Lynn Dillon and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.