Cases 71 - 80 of 87
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Graham v. Beck
as 3:2009cv00149
Petitioner:
Charles F. Graham
Respondent:
Theodis Beck and Frederick Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ra Job Discrimination (Race)
Thomas v. Mann et al
as 3:2008cv00502
Plaintiff:
Alfred T. Thomas
Defendant:
Christy T. Mann, Mecklenburg County Courts, McDowell Street Center for Family Law, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
The Noble Moors of the "Bey and "El" Tribes et al v. State of North Carolina et al
as 2:2008cv00021
Plaintiff:
The Noble Moors of the "Bey and "El" Tribes, James Anderson-Bey, Eric Evans-El and others
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Cumberland County District Attorney, Cumberland County Clerk of Court and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Graham v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00338
Plaintiff:
Pearl Graham
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Graham et al v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00151
Plaintiff:
Randy Joe Graham and Patricia S. Graham
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
