Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Azar El v. Cabarrus County et al
as 3:2024cv00423
Petitioner:
Rashaud Hussein Azar El doing business as Jerimy Love
Respondent:
Cabarrus County, Cabarrus County Jail, Mike Downs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Azar El v. Cabarrus County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00243
Petitioner:
Rashaud Hussem Azar El doing business as Jerimy Love
Respondent:
Cabarrus County Jail, Mike Downs, Angel Gonzalez and others
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gonzalez-Valdez v. USA
as 5:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
Uvaldo Gonzalez-Valdez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Gonzalez v. USA
as 5:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
Justo Manuel Gonzalez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Gonzalez v. USA
as 3:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
Yolanda Gonzalez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Gonzalez v. USA
as 3:2023cv00904
Petitioner:
Yolanda Gonzalez
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Gonzalez v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2023cv00403
Plaintiff:
Martin Marin Gonzalez
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, John Doe, I, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hernandez-Gonzalez v. Jones
as 3:2023cv00366
Petitioner:
Esteban Hernandez-Gonzalez
Respondent:
Timothy Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
