Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Henderson v. Hawk et al
as 3:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Shanriqua Henderson
Defendant:
Virginia Hawk, David Herman, W.M. Prescott and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Reece v. Horner et al
as 5:2023cv00116
Defendant:
Thomas Horner, Matthew David Leach, Joshua Hawks and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Ray Reece
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Platinum Press, Inc. v. Douros-Hawk
as 3:2018cv00458
Plaintiff:
Platinum Press, Inc.
Defendant:
Danielle Douros-Hawk
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Carolina Tractor & Equipment Company
as 3:2016cv00267
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Carolina Tractor & Equipment Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Gaston College
as 3:2015cv00433
Plaintiff:
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Gaston College
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Electric Guard Dog, LLC v. Fence Hawk, Inc., et al
as 3:2014cv00292
Plaintiff:
Electric Guard Dog, LLC
Defendant:
Fence Hawk, Inc. , Fence Guardian, Inc. and Intelligent Fencing Systems Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Jamison v. Hawk et al
as 3:2012cv00150
Plaintiff:
Ephesian Jamison, Sr.
Defendant:
P. Hawk and Andrew Murray
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawks v. Cirrus Group Holding Company et al
as 3:2011cv00298
Plaintiff:
Tracy Hawks
Defendant:
Cirrus Group Holding Company , Cirrus Medical Staffing, Inc , Cirrus Holdings USA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Aerologistics Investment Partners, LLC et al v. Cessna Aircraft Company
as 5:2010cv00092
Plaintiff:
Aerologistics Investment Partners, LLC , River Hawk Aviation, Inc. and Profile Aviation Center, Inc.
Defendant:
Cessna Aircraft Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
