Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Burr v. Macon County Sheriffs Office et al
as 1:2020cv00131
Defendant:
Christopher Prince, Robbie Holland, Karen Alphonso and others
Plaintiff:
Joshuah L Burr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince Parker & Associates, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00470
Respondent:
Jenny Brown
Petitioner:
Prince Parker & Associates, Inc.
Prince v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv00605
Plaintiff:
Andrea D. Prince
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Burr v. Macon County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2016cv00401
Plaintiff:
Joshua L. Burr
Defendant:
Macon County Sheriff's Office, NC DOC, Kristopher Prince and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffield v. Hartgrave et al
as 3:2013de00653
Plaintiff:
Timothy Coffield
Defendant:
FNU Hartgrave, FNU Williams, FNU Prince and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Prince Hall Grand Lodge et al
as 3:2012de00626
Plaintiff:
Theron Preston Washington
Defendant:
Prince Hall Grand Lodge, Darray Vaughn, FNU Sessom and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey et al v. Polk County, North Carolina et al
as 1:2010cv00264
Plaintiff:
Max Bailey , Margaret Dalton , Carlton Bill Huntley and others
Defendant:
Polk County, North Carolina, Polk County Sheriff's Department, Matthew Prince and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00179
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Prince v. Home Depot U.S.A, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00175
Plaintiff:
Jason Prince
Defendant:
Home Depot USA, Inc. and Home Depot USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
