Cases 101 - 110 of 16,445
Dobson v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 8:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Kerry Dobson
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Frazier v. Gonzales-Sandoval et al
as 8:2024cv00307
Defendant:
Adam Oathout, Ruth Sandoval, Katherine Gonzales-Sandoval and others
Plaintiff:
Alphonso V. Frazier, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Leidel et al
as 8:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Terry Curtis Williams
Defendant:
Mathew Leidel and Anthony L. Conner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuqua v. Buffalo County Sheriff
as 4:2024cv03133
Plaintiff:
Joshua Alan Fuqua
Defendant:
Buffalo County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Menchaca v. Meyers
as 8:2024cv00304
Petitioner:
Manuel B. Menchaca
Respondent:
Micheal Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Mathew v. Hy-Vee, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Sherwin Mathew
Defendant:
Hy-Vee, Inc. and Brian D. Briggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Bundy v. Loup Valley Rural Public Power District
as 4:2024cv00192
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Sims v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv00302
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Courvoisier Sims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. $29,555.00 United States Currency
as 8:2024cv00301
Defendant:
$29,555.00 United States Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
