Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Berkley et al v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Dana Berkley, Nina Pallman, Etoya Garrett and others
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores, Inc., Dollar Tree, Inc., Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bowen v. Gordon et al
as 1:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Kyle Bowen
Defendant:
Thomas Gordon, Arthur G. Dun, Denise M. Resta-Tobin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dean v. Rescue Dogs Rescue Soldiers Corp. et al
as 3:2023cv01370
Plaintiff:
Arlene Dean
Defendant:
Rescue Dogs Rescue Soldiers Corp., Glen Wild Animal Rescue Corp., El-Liza's Dog House Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bowen et al v. Veritas Technologies, LLC
as 1:2021cv00812
Plaintiff:
Bryan Bowen, Chandler Hill, Jennifer Hoskins and others
Defendant:
Veritas Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bowen v. Saul
as 1:2020cv01310
Plaintiff:
John F. Bowen
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bowen v. Elm Tree Golf Course, Inc.
as 5:2020cv00808
Defendant:
Elm Tree Golf Course, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Philip Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bowens v. Superintendent
as 9:2019cv00863
Petitioner:
Stanley Bowens
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowen v. USA
as 1:2019cv00794
Petitioner:
Liam Bowen
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bowens v. Pellegrino et al
as 6:2018cv01426
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe #2, John/Jane Doe #1, S. Redrat and others
Plaintiff:
Tremayne Bowens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowens v. Bombardier et al
as 9:2018cv01377
Defendant:
Gregory Archer, Daniel J. Bombardier, Matthew A. Lafountain and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Bowens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
