Cases 21 - 30 of 232
Cook v. Bowers
as 3:2022cv01418
Plaintiff:
Johnnie D. Cook
Defendant:
Mrs. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cook v. DeWine et al
as 3:2022cv01292
Plaintiff:
Matthew Cook
Defendant:
Governor Mike DeWine, Dave Yost, Director Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gibson-Leonard v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 3:2022cv01083
Plaintiff:
Bobby J. Gibson-Leonard
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cook v. Garza
as 4:2022cv01064
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Cook
Defendant:
Warden F. Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cook v. Lt. Wierich
as 3:2022cv01015
Plaintiff:
Johnnie D. Cook
Defendant:
Lt. Wierich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Riveredge Dentistry Partnership v. City of Cleveland, et al
as 1:2022cv01007
Plaintiff:
Riveredge Dentistry Partnership
Defendant:
City of Cleveland, Cook Paving & Construction Company and Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District
MMI-CPR, LLC v. Work Hard Play Hard Enterprises Limited et al
as 1:2022cv00758
Plaintiff:
MMI-CPR, LLC
Defendant:
Work Hard Play Hard Enterprises Limited and Ryan Cook
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Zimmerman v. City of Wickliffe et al
as 1:2022cv00725
Plaintiff:
Amanda Zimmerman
Defendant:
City of Wickliffe, David Cook, Kevin Ankuda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Figliano v. United States Government et al
as 3:2022cv00322
Plaintiff:
Christan Figliano
Defendant:
United States Government, State of Ohio Police, Toledo Police and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Moore v. Cook et al
as 3:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
Antoine Maurice Moore
Defendant:
Judge Gary G. Cook and Adult Parole Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
