Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Copeland v. Richland County/Richland County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2023cv01517
Plaintiff:
Jon Copeland
Defendant:
Richland County/Richland County Board of Commissioners, J. Steve Sheldon, Chuka D. Onyeneke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy et al v. Akron Police Department et al
as 5:2021cv00051
Plaintiff:
Clyde McCoy, J C M, Leila Cruz and others
Defendant:
Edna Copeland, Chanelwood Village, Akron Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeland v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv01638
Defendant:
Cook Medical, LLC, Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Marquita Copeland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Copeland v. Morgan
as 1:2020cv01600
Petitioner:
James Copeland
Respondent:
Warden Donald Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Copeland, et al.
as 1:2020cv00589
Defendant:
Brandon E. Copeland and E.B. & Copeland Capital, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Copeland
as 1:2019cv02744
Defendant:
Brandon E. Copeland
Plaintiff:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Noco Company v. Copeland
as 1:2019cv01779
Defendant:
Catherine Copeland
Plaintiff:
Noco Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Copeland, et al. v. Fay Servicing, LLC
as 1:2019cv01741
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Copeland and Tonya R. Copeland
Defendant:
Fay Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01659
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Hannay et al v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Ohio Council 8 et al
as 5:2019cv00951
Defendant:
Catherine L Ross, F. Jack Witt, III., Donald L Mason and others
Plaintiff:
Adda Gape, Annamarie Hannay and John Kohl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
