Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Owensby v. City of Dayton et al
as 3:2021cv00343
Plaintiff:
Clifford Owensby
Defendant:
City of Dayton, Wayne M Hammock and Vincent J Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clifford v. Keckley et al
as 2:2019cv00119
Defendant:
John or Mary Doe 1, Steven G. Rosser, Mary S. Praither and others
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Clifford and Stormy Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rucker v. Heekin et al
as 1:2018cv00005
Plaintiff:
Clifford L. Rucker
Defendant:
Tom Heekin, Steven E. Martin, Ernest Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rucker v. Hardy et al
as 1:2017cv00823
Plaintiff:
Clifford I. Rucker
Defendant:
Hardy, The Kroger Company and Tom Holman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shoup v. Doyle et al
as 3:2012cv00351
Plaintiff:
Patsy Shoup
Defendant:
Brian M Doyle , Shawn F Waler , Anthony W Ashley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kiser v. Reitz et al
as 2:2012cv00574
Plaintiff:
Russell Kiser
Defendant:
Lili Reitz , Marybeth D Shaffer , Jacinto W Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark et al v. Village of Enon et al
as 3:2011cv00273
Plaintiff:
Larry Ned Clark and Mary Kathryn Clark
Defendant:
Village of Enon, Clifford Vernon and Troy Callahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kalniz v. Ohio State Dental Board et al
as 2:2009cv00561
Plaintiff:
Scott Kalniz, DDS
Defendant:
Ohio State Dental Board, Mark T. Armstrong, DDS, Billie Sue Kyger, DDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
