Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Bradley et al v. The City of Columbus et al
as 2:2024cv03118
Plaintiff:
Jalen Bradley and Ja-Dawn Bradley
Defendant:
The City of Columbus, The City of Columbus Division of Police, Carl Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wilcox v. State of Ohio et al
as 2:2023cv02477
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Wilcox
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Lancaster Correctional Institution, C.O. Whitey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boykin et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 1:2023cv00427
Plaintiff:
Rah-Nita Boykin, Jennifer Harmon and Elizabeth Rodriguez
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harmon v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01249
Plaintiff:
Tasiana Harmon
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Harmon v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00589
Plaintiff:
Clarence Troy Harmon
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harmon v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03860
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY HARMON
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harmon v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv02994
Plaintiff:
Sammy Harmon
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harmon v. USA
as 1:2022cv00415
Petitioner:
Rickey Harmon
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Allah v. Chambers Smith et al
as 2:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
El-Barseem K. Allah
Defendant:
Annette Chambers Smith, Ron Erdos, L. Mahlman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv00573
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harmon
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
