Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Skidmore v. Davol Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00142
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Constance Skidmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heidenescher v. Mohr et al
as 2:2014cv00344
Plaintiff:
Edward D. Heidenescher
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, CO Mills, Sgt. Skidmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings et al v. Rastaher et al
as 1:2013cv00868
Plaintiff:
Lemarr Jennings and Alonzo Dean Shepard, r
Defendant:
Douglas M. Rastaher, Gary Mohr, Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wheeler v. Dayton Police Dept. et al
as 3:2013cv00290
Plaintiff:
Eric D. Wheeler
Defendant:
Dayton Police Dept., Michael L. Skidmore , Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. KERNS et al
as 1:2011cv00698
Plaintiff:
Billy Rogers
Defendant:
KERNS, MORGAN, WARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Black v. Cincinnati Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00210
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Black
Defendant:
Cincinnati Financial Corporation , John J. Schiff, Jr. , Thomas R. Schiff and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Skidmore v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00649
Plaintiff:
Gloria Skidmore
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Real Property Known and Numbered as 52 North Rodgers Avenue, Columbus, Franklin County, Ohio, et al
as 2:2010cv00330
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real Property Known and Numbered as 52 North Rodgers Avenue, Columbus, Franklin County, Ohio,, Real Property Known and Numbered as 1501 thomas Avenue, Columbus, Franklin County, Ohio, Real Property Known and Numbered as 300 Cypress Avenue, Columbus, Franklin County, Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
